Skip to main content
  1. Posts/

Setting Team Norms That Actually Stick

· loading · loading ·
Jared Lynskey
Author
Jared Lynskey
Emerging leader and software engineer based in Seoul, South Korea

Introduction
#

Effective teamwork is the bedrock of success in today’s dynamic workplaces. Central to this success are team norms – the implicit and explicit guidelines that govern team behavior and interactions. As the Center for Creative Leadership puts it: “Team norms are a set of rules or operating principles that shape team members’ interactions.”

But here’s what makes norms so powerful: Google’s Project Aristotle, a landmark study of 180+ teams, found that who is on a team matters far less than how the team works together. The norms teams establish—not individual talent—drive performance.

The Research: Why Norms Matter More Than Talent
#

Google’s research identified five key dynamics that distinguish high-performing teams:

  1. Psychological Safety – Members feel safe taking interpersonal risks without fear of embarrassment
  2. Dependability – Team members reliably complete quality work on time
  3. Structure and Clarity – Clear understanding of roles, expectations, and goals
  4. Meaning – Members find personal purpose in their work
  5. Impact – Workers see how their contributions matter to organizational goals

The data is compelling: teams with high psychological safety showed 43% higher performance variance, 19% higher productivity, 31% more innovation, and 27% lower turnover rates.

Core Principles: Respect, Intentionality, and Diversity
#

Building on this research, three foundational principles underpin effective team norms:

  • Respect: Acknowledging the value of each team member’s contributions fosters trust and encourages open dialogue. This directly enables psychological safety—when people feel respected, they’re more likely to take interpersonal risks.
  • Intentionality: Deliberate and purposeful interactions promote clarity, understanding, and alignment with team goals. This addresses the “structure and clarity” dynamic that Google identified as essential.
  • Diversity: Embracing diverse perspectives enhances problem-solving capabilities and fosters innovation. Research consistently shows that teams with varied perspectives outperform homogeneous groups.

Implementing Key Norms
#

Operationalizing team norms involves integrating them into daily team operations:

Meetings & Time Management
#

  • Establish clear agendas distributed in advance
  • Practice active listening—summarize others’ points before responding
  • Start and end on time to demonstrate respect
  • Consider the advanced agenda rule: no agenda, no meeting

Communication
#

  • Default to transparency and over-communication
  • Create multiple channels for input (not everyone speaks up in meetings)
  • Solicit input from quieter team members deliberately
  • Document decisions and share context broadly

Conflict Resolution
#

  • Assume positive intent before responding to disagreements
  • Separate the problem from the person
  • Focus on interests, not positions
  • Use structured mediation when needed

A Practical Framework for Setting Norms
#

The Center for Creative Leadership recommends a reflection-based approach:

  1. Reflect on past experiences: Have each member identify their worst and best team experiences
  2. Share and discuss: What made the bad teams dysfunctional? What made the good teams work?
  3. Identify patterns: What behaviors contribute to positive vs. negative dynamics?
  4. Propose specific norms: Suggest concrete behaviors for your current team
  5. Build consensus: Discuss and agree on which norms to adopt
  6. Anticipate challenges: Flag realistic obstacles the team might face
  7. Establish accountability: Decide how norm violations will be addressed
  8. Document and revisit: Make norms visible and review them regularly

Pro tip: Start with just 3-5 norms and add more once those become second nature. Trying to change too much at once rarely works.

Navigating Challenges#

Implementing team norms is not without challenges:

  • Resistance to change: Some team members may view norm-setting as unnecessary bureaucracy. Address this by involving them in the process and demonstrating quick wins.
  • Inconsistent application: Norms only work when everyone—especially leaders—models them consistently. One manager ignoring the norms undermines the entire system.
  • Cultural differences: Global teams may have different baseline expectations. Make implicit assumptions explicit.
  • New team members: Onboarding should include explicit norm discussions, not just hoping newcomers “pick it up.”

Three Rituals High-Performing Teams Practice
#

Research on high-performing teams found that the best teams consistently do three things:

  1. Kickoffs: Explicitly align on goals, roles, and working agreements at project start
  2. One-on-ones: Regular individual conversations build trust and surface issues early
  3. Retrospectives: Periodic reflection on what’s working and what needs adjustment

These aren’t optional extras—they’re the mechanisms through which norms are reinforced and refined.

Conclusion
#

Google’s research is clear: how a team works together matters more than who’s on it. Norms are how you shape that “how.”

Start with 3-5 norms. Involve the team in defining them. Revisit them regularly. The best teams aren’t built on individual talent—they’re built on shared agreements about how to work together.